
We had 5 waves off the 994 H, however, there is huge 4-1 overlap. The only structure that is allowed with overlap are diagonals, both leading and ending. Do we have a leading diagonal?
Technically, we very well could. This would be a leading expanding diagonal, as opposed to contracting, which is more common. According to Prechter, "A leading diagonal in the wave one position is typically followed by a deep retracement", p. 41 Elliott Wave Principle. We had a retracement that ticked the 78.6%.
I'm not sure folks. Even if it turns out that it is indeed a LD, it is a very unsatisfying beginning to B. I will begrudgingly use it as my preferred count until proven otherwise.
There is still the possibility that this is wave (iv) and A has not yet completed. That would mean we have another little leg higher in (v). The majority of the evidence points to A being finished, and based on structure that's my belief.
It does appear that we have 5 waves coming off the 990.50 H. Perhaps this ugly minuette (i) has completed and we are ready to start impulsing. It should be noted that we broke the 2-4 channel.
(iii) = (i) at 974.75. The reciprocal to our 78.6% is the 127.2% at 970.50. A Pi ratio is also there. Lets see how price interacts at that number.
The next few days will give us a clue as to what type of structure this minor B will trace. A zigzag would be a pleasant surprise. Please Lord don't let it be some congested drawn out triangle...I'm begging!
I really don't have anything major on the timing front. Wednesday should be a daily cycle low day. There is a moon that comes in Wednesday as well. August should be a cycle peak on the monthly. Kool if your tuned in - please chime in if you have anything good.

No comments:
Post a Comment